Your school, in their language.

Is this a full course translation?

Yes, in the end, and in an order that does not waste it. The pilot is one lesson in the sixteen languages, judged by your members. Then each language’s money path opens first, as one whole: the discovery lesson, the sales page and the core modules a new member needs. The catalogue follows in waves behind it, and the next language follows in the order your members set. Translating a whole course before anyone has judged a lesson in that language is the expensive way to find out whether they will.

Why sixteen languages at once, and why not Chinese?

Because one language tells you about one audience, and a pilot is there to learn where your school travels. The sixteen were chosen for where YouTube’s audience is, and every one is a language YouTube can automatically dub an English video into. Chinese is not among them because YouTube is not available in mainland China, where most Chinese speakers are.

My community still runs in English. Does that matter?

It matters, so the pilot says it out loud. The community deliverable is a language-native space for each open language, inside your group or as a separate group, decided per pilot and seeded with your existing bilingual members. What stays in English, and who answers in each new language, is named in writing before anyone is invited. Nobody is invited into an experience they cannot use.

Do you need access to my platform, checkout or member list?

Not to enquire, and not for the fit review. Public links and a sentence about your goal are enough. If a pilot goes ahead, any access is scoped to what the pilot needs, agreed in writing and revocable by you. Member data is never part of an enquiry.

Do you dub my lessons?

Not by default, and never without a written agreement. Where a video is eligible, YouTube’s own automatic dubbing can add a second audio track, and those dubs cannot be edited. A track produced for a pilot is a scoped option, agreed in writing with the voice permissions it needs. No dubbed audio exists on this site. The proof here is original English audio, not dubbed; what it shows is captions and metadata.

What does it cost?

It is agreed per pilot from three things: source minutes, review coverage and rights, with each community space priced as its own line. The sixteen languages are the pilot, not a line item. There is no published rate, because a rate would have to ignore all three, and you would be paying for the average offer instead of yours.

Can you promise members?

No. We are not promising to make your content better, change your thumbnails or crack the algorithm; none of that is in our control. Whether people join depends on your offer, your price in each market and how the platform treats each language, and a promised number would be a forecast dressed as a fact. What the pilot gives you is a baseline, a measured path and a written result you can act on: continue, change or stop.

Why now?

Because the platforms moved. Skool’s interface now ships in eleven languages, and YouTube wrote in February 2026 that “Auto dubbing is now available to everyone, with an expanded library of 27 languages.” The translation half of the job is becoming a commodity. The half that decides whether a member finds you, follows the path and joins is not, and the creators who open their second markets first are the ones each language finds when it searches.

Could I use YouTube’s automatic dubbing or a translation tool myself?

You could, and the translation itself is genuinely cheap now. Run the version you would have to do: for each lesson the transcript, the translation, the timing, the title, the description, the thumbnail text, the page it leads to, then each piece placed by hand, sixteen times over. That is tens of thousands of small decisions, held to one standard, in languages you do not speak. A pilot decides your terminology once, keeps the promise on the video consistent with the promise on the page, names who supports the member afterwards, and measures whether any of it converted.

Request a fit review